Whee
Michael's Law of Awesomeness
----------------------------
I = Me (I am Me)
I > U (I am greater than You)
(U - Me) < 0 (Without Me, You are less than Nothing)
I'm sure Stockholm will be calling me any day now =)
-mike
----------------------------
I = Me (I am Me)
I > U (I am greater than You)
(U - Me) < 0 (Without Me, You are less than Nothing)
I'm sure Stockholm will be calling me any day now =)
-mike
posted by chrisracer at 3:57 PM
5 Comments:
Not exactly the most robust Law of Awesomeness. While it does state you're greater than I am (and that does indeed make you quite awesome) your laws don't help you in the case that I am inherently less than Nothing (pretend I am David or something. Ya know, like a fine arts major). In that case, the inequality U - Me < 0 does not guarantee that you are not less than Nothing, and since with your "Law" you can't definitively show you're greater than Nothing, you can't assert that you're awesome.
i think i got dissed there in that comment...
-DK
Ya, I really have nothing better to do.
Though the insult that I rather liked, not that it was set up in a manner where people would actually get it or anything, was the comment "There's enough ugly flying around. Literally." as a reference to Yap (who at the time was at UCLA, via a plane).
you bastard, I didn't even hear that insult.
I forgive you though, I guess your brain's a little woozy from being hit by the ugly stick so many times, eh?
Well, ya, anyone who saw your face would feel dizzy and sick for some time afterwards, and you were here for a week. And that was before David came. Being beaten by the ugly stick would have been merciful in comparison.
I jest of course (at least about jesting). The highlight of my college career is most definitely the phrase "all-you-can-eat meat," and then attempting to prove it. Got to hit up that spicy ramen place eventually too.
And if you can't tell, I'm hungry right now.
Sigh... the downsides of eating at 5.
Post a Comment
<< Home